This post is more than 5 years old
24 Posts
0
940
August 11th, 2009 05:00
Agent Load Balancing
I suspect that i'll need to raise on this one but i'll give it a go anyway.
I have a multihop config across 3 sites and have sym/sdm agents in SiteA and SiteB.
SiteA has array 123
SiteB has array 456
SiteC has array 789
Links between SiteA & SiteB are synchronous
Links between SiteB & SiteC are asynchronous(cascased SRDF).
In ECC 6.1 UB3, SiteC array 789 is currently being managed by SiteA SYM agent so is showing as remotely managed over SRDF.
I also have other legs that are the reverse in that SiteA arrays are managed by SiteC SYM agent.
This can't be very efficient at all - is there a way of stopping this from happening ?
I have a multihop config across 3 sites and have sym/sdm agents in SiteA and SiteB.
SiteA has array 123
SiteB has array 456
SiteC has array 789
Links between SiteA & SiteB are synchronous
Links between SiteB & SiteC are asynchronous(cascased SRDF).
In ECC 6.1 UB3, SiteC array 789 is currently being managed by SiteA SYM agent so is showing as remotely managed over SRDF.
I also have other legs that are the reverse in that SiteA arrays are managed by SiteC SYM agent.
This can't be very efficient at all - is there a way of stopping this from happening ?
No Events found!
RRR
2 Intern
•
5.7K Posts
0
August 11th, 2009 06:00
I asked EMC the same thing back then and there was no solution they said.
The only solution I found was disable an agent and let the failover take place from this one agent to the other. when you bring the agent back up the Symm stays where it is and the load is better balanced.
Perhaps that with newer ECC's than the 5.2SP5 which I had, this behavior is enhanced and is working better.
Anyone ?
RRR
2 Intern
•
5.7K Posts
0
August 11th, 2009 06:00
Martyn1
24 Posts
0
August 11th, 2009 06:00
Allen Ward
4 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
1
August 11th, 2009 13:00
Mind you we have a much simpler config than you. I only have 3 DMX3 arrays at 3 sites with an SRDF/A link between two of them. I have Symm/SDM agents deployed on local hosts at all three sites.
I guess the only thing you didn't specifically mention checking is that the local hosts for each site have access to gatekeepers from each and every array at that site. If you have an agent on a host at site A but that host can't "see" gatekeepers from an array at that site you could end up managing the array through an RDF link from an agent at another site.
Martyn1
24 Posts
0
August 11th, 2009 14:00
Yes we do have GK's (8 from each array) allocated to the local management servers.