Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

N

847

April 29th, 2019 12:00

VNX5300 LUN migration

We have a VNX5300 block-only array, which is housing several LUNs. Recently we have had some user complaints regarding a slowness problem with a system we will be going LIVE on soon. I discovered the server is sitting on a thin LUN which has compression turned on (Medium rate). It is also a SQL server which is getting a lot of use currently due to prep work for GO-LIVE. From what I have read, I think the compression could be affecting the server performance.

This is the only LUN with compression turned on for the entire array. I did not setup this VNX so I am not sure why compression is turned on. 

My question is, would it be okay to setup a new LUN (compression NOT on) to migrate the compressed LUN to? 

Do the 2 LUNs need to be the same size, per https://community.emc.com/docs/DOC-52120  ? If the answer is yes, won't I have a problem with sizing due to the LUN currently being compressed and then it will take up more space being uncompressed? 

Also, do I need to decompress the LUN before performing the migration?

Thank you for any help you can provide, as we unfortunately have hardware only support on this array. 

 

 

 

No Responses!
No Events found!

Top