Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
44 Posts
0
1509
January 25th, 2010 08:00
SDR Device Mapping Performance on ECC UB7
Hello All,
In our current distributed ECC environment we have 2 managment workstations (has the agents) and 2 data stores. On each of the managment workstations we have 16 seperate gatekeepers assigned to each of our DMX-4 4500. I would think we've got enough of the componenets needed to allow device mapping to perform relatively quickly in ECC but that isn't the case.
It seems that mapping configured devices takes much longer than unconfigured devices. The slowness I'm talking about is after ECC aquires the lock on Symmetrix. Which also takes forever but that has always been a problem.
Is there anything that I maybe overlooking? From your experience how does devicing mapping perform in ECC?
Thanks,
Ayo
AAdedipe
44 Posts
0
January 25th, 2010 10:00
Alan,
Thanks for that little bit of history. We are currently using SMC for most functions but our senior engineer is telling me that the mapping performance has gotten worse off since I remade our ECC environment into a distributed infrastructure environment. He claims that when we had ECC on only 2 pieces of hardware. It performed much better but still leagues slower than mapping through SMC.
Below is an overview of what our environment looks like. If its not worth it to use ECC for mappnig I'll let him know what the user community says but if there is a glaring configuration problem I'd like to correct it if possible.
TIA
Phsyical Server 1:
ECC Server
ECC Repository
Agents:
Symmetrix Agent
SDM Agent
NAS Agent
WLA Archive
Clariion Agent
VM Server 1:
ECC Repository
ECC Server
Phsyical Server 2:
StorageScope Server
StorageScope Reposity
ECC Store
Agents:
Symmetrix Agent
SDM Agent
NAS Agent
WLA Archive
Clariion Agent
VM Server 2:
StorageScope Server
StorageScope Repository
Performance Manager
WLA Archive
VM Server 3:
ECC Store
ECC WebConsole
VM Server 4:
ECC Store
Phsyical Server 1:
SMC
SymCLI/NaviCL
ECC Console
ECC Agents:
FCC Agent
VMWare Agent
SDM Agent
Symmetrix Agent
NAS Agent
WLA Archive Agent
Phsyical Server 2:
SMC
SymCLI/NaviCL
ECC Console
ECC Agents:
FCC Agent
VMWare Agent
SDM Agent
Symmetrix Agent
NAS Agent
WLA Archive Agent
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
January 25th, 2010 10:00
I find SMC performance dog slow as well ...symcli for life
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
Allen Ward
4 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
1
January 25th, 2010 10:00
We gave up on Device Mapping in CC back under 5.2 and have not seen anything since to change this. We do all out mapping through command line or SMC. The mapping through CC was so slow it was painful.
If you are not using SMC you should seriously consider it. For some things you gett effectively the same performance of CLI while getting the advantages of a GUI as well.
llittlefield
10 Posts
0
February 2nd, 2010 17:00
Hi,
I have just implemented ECC 6.1 UB7. I have noticed that the SDR Device Mapping is very slow, even compared to ECC 6.1 UB5. I am interested to hear any tips to improve the performance.
I performed a device mapping and it seemed to be going well (smoothly and fairly quickly) until the very end of the procedure when it was "Refreshing the Database". It sat there for about 15 - 20 minutes before completing. Has anyone else had this slow performance?
Luke
Allen Ward
4 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
February 3rd, 2010 11:00
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
February 3rd, 2010 11:00
Allen Ward
4 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
February 3rd, 2010 11:00
Hey dynamox,
I'm surprised to hear that SMC performance is slow for you. We generally get close to CLI speeds out of it. Sometimes it is faster overall if the GUI advantage makes the set up easier (sometimes, but far from always). If I'm doing large volumes of devices at a time (rare) I still find it faster to set run through CLI with a script.
Allen Ward
4 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
February 3rd, 2010 12:00
dynamox
9 Legend
•
20.4K Posts
0
February 3rd, 2010 13:00
Allen Ward
4 Operator
•
2.1K Posts
0
February 4th, 2010 08:00