Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
21 Posts
0
883
August 19th, 2008 13:00
Port Counts Wrong on i10K
Has anyone seen this issue, on my 5.2 SP4 ECC I have i10K switches reporting as 244 Ports, on my new 6.0 ECC Infrastructure the exact same switches report as 256 Ports ? Is there a known bug in 6.0 that is causing the difference in Port Count ?
No Events found!
NimaiSood
55 Posts
0
August 19th, 2008 23:00
Do you have i10k with Partitions in use ? Because there is limitation with EFCM and also issues with FibreZone Bridge , McData Api in an i10K partitioned Environment which causes this problem.
Regards
Nimai
RRSiemers
19 Posts
0
August 20th, 2008 11:00
Installed ports changed from 80 to 88 on swicth XXXXX 9509
Installed ports changed from 46 to 48 on switch XXXXX 9216i
None of my other 25 switches have this issue.
Pretty sure my issue is a problem with ethernet ports (for iSCSI) as the 2 9509s have an 8 port IP storage card, and the 9216i has 2 ethernet ports for storage.
Perchance does your switch have 12 iscsi/ethernet ports?
Message was edited by:
RRSiemers
JAB4
6 Posts
0
August 20th, 2008 12:00
VerizonEd
21 Posts
0
September 16th, 2008 08:00
Development Engineering has found that a change in the FCC agent bridge interface from SNMP in the ECC 6.0 base FCC agent version to McData SWAPI in the ECC 6.0 current FCC agent version is the reason for the difference in displayed port information.
A hotfix is presently being tested for release.
jasonj1
1 Rookie
•
50 Posts
0
September 18th, 2008 09:00