Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

303

May 5th, 2008 08:00

ECC 6.0 managment

My question is if I purchased all the required agents to use all the ECC 6.0 functionality, does it matter how much storage I plan to manage (hosts, switches, arrays...etc)?

Am I supposed to be paying more every time I add a DAE or any Array (storage) even though the agents needed were already purchased?

If so, were do I get some kind of guide on how much to expect to be paying?

Thanks.

4 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

May 6th, 2008 07:00

Most of the functionality of ECC is paid for by capacity. Every time you add storage to a managed EMC array you will pay for a tier upgrade for the associated licenses.

I can't give you specifics on how much it costs every time you add disk because it has a lot to do with your sales agreement with EMC, but for a rough idea, start researching the GNP of some smaller countries and you should be in the right ballpark ;-)

In our case, for DMX storage approximately 5% of each disk order is for the actual hardware and the rest covers the licensing upgrade. Mind you, we get REALLY good discounts on the hardware.

2 Intern

 • 

5.7K Posts

May 6th, 2008 23:00

Only 5% ? Waaaw.....
I'd switch to SymCLI completely if I were you ;)

4 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

May 12th, 2008 08:00

Yeah, but management wants us to do things through an interface that logs everything, and they also want charge back in the near future. StorageScope is going to make that MUCH easier.

2 Intern

 • 

5.7K Posts

May 13th, 2008 01:00

As long as they pay for it, I wouldn't bother.
Possible pitfalls are: charge back on clusters, since each node will report the same storage as their own, while you probably only need to charge it once. The same goes for replicated storage. SRDF'd storage is probably no issue, since the R2's are presented to hosts on the other side, which is fine, but BCV's don't show up, unless they are masked to hosts.

4 Operator

 • 

2.1K Posts

May 13th, 2008 11:00

There are ways around the BCV issue, and I have no problem with charging someone double for the clusters. They are a pain, and they should have to pay more to maintain them ;-)
No Events found!

Top