Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
2 Intern
•
138 Posts
0
435
June 25th, 2008 07:00
What are your average archived mail retrieval times?
Hello, like my other thread, i'm interested in seeing what the EX community is experiencing in regards to wait times opening arcrhived mail.
Our environment is Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003 but any and all environment information is useful as I'm just looking for general comments across the board. EX server has local SQL DB.
Our users experience a wait time of between 5 seconds and 80 seconds.
Thanks in advance for sharing.
Our environment is Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003 but any and all environment information is useful as I'm just looking for general comments across the board. EX server has local SQL DB.
Our users experience a wait time of between 5 seconds and 80 seconds.
Thanks in advance for sharing.
No Events found!
M314
36 Posts
0
June 26th, 2008 12:00
In early experiments it has been "a few seconds".
The EX system and the Centera are not heavily used at this time.
xrobsteelex
16 Posts
0
June 26th, 2008 13:00
what kind of hardware is running the archive server?
jskoecher
2 Intern
•
204 Posts
0
June 30th, 2008 00:00
agreed, up to 80 seconds is quite long. What storage contains your EMX files. Is it extended? To what?
Never mind the messaging system or the Outlook, between 1-2 seconds and 5-8, the item should be available, considering a LAN network bandwidth (no test from a remote location), no user cache, good SQL performance and good storage access. - I've seen an issue, where SQL was not accessible (remote server), then I also only had access times for 80-90 secondes. But then also no new emails are archived.
Hope this helps,
Jochen.
minfin
46 Posts
0
July 17th, 2008 08:00
When we had just deployed EX in our environment we experienced a slow retrieval time also. After adding [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\EMC\EXShortcutAddin\EXLIST]
"EXServer1"="http://YOURSERVERNAME/EXShortcut/query.asp" to the client's registry, the retrieval of messages is now between 1 and 2 seconds.
Kind regards,
Duncan