Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
32 Posts
0
465
September 20th, 2007 00:00
In Topology builder Building group by "isManaged" criteria does not work.
Does anybody use this feature to create Unmanaged selective group?
It's may be very usefull in case a large count of Unmanaged objects.
It's may be very usefull in case a large count of Unmanaged objects.
No Events found!
Dinand1
89 Posts
0
September 20th, 2007 02:00
i did try myself and it does work!
you must be careful with the selected target class and also the isManaged statement must be compared to 'TRUE' or 'FALSE' be careful with upper and lower cases in SMARTS some stuff might not work ...
And you will get your new group in the groups tab ...
cheers
Fernando
pd. don't forget to save the group and regroup it
itc2
32 Posts
0
September 21st, 2007 02:00
with "true" All Ok, and we observe ALL object list including Unmanaged ???!!!!!
but with "false" does't want to work.
Dinand1
89 Posts
0
October 2nd, 2007 23:00
The attributte used is the one in SAM not the one in AM-PM.
SAM's behaviour for this attribute does not rely on the status of the same attribute in AM-PM. this the explanation on SAM's admin guide
IsManaged Boolean Determines if the system is monitored by Global
Manager. Note that unmanaged elements do not
appear in the Global Manager topology.
So, if the element is in the SAM Topology the status os isManaged will be TRUE.
The only way to change that is through dmctl as follows
From /SAM/smarts/bin, issue command:
./dmctl -s invoke manage
To get run the following command:
./dmctl -s getI Interface
Likewise, to unmanage an interface run the following command:
./dmctl -s invoke unmanage
To check the status, issue command:
./dmctl -s get class:: ::IsManaged
example
./dmctl -s INCHARGE-SA invoke Switch::Switch1 unmanage
this will set up the status of your swith in SAM to unamaged and the value of IsManaged to FALSE
I did test it and it works, the only issue is that you have to write a small script in order to do so, but you can trigger it throug the console using the server actions too
cheers
Fernando