This post is more than 5 years old
8 Posts
0
2952
May 17th, 2017 06:00
corrupt SMARTS repositories
I read KB 000447456 (easy way to check this in Windows FWIW: findstr /B /C:" " <.rps file> | find /v "" /c) and ran a check on all of my domains. ALMOST everything checked out fine; ACM and ESM had numbers for 'T ' that were waaaaaaay off.
The problem is that both ACM and ESM get their topology from other domains. I can easily rename the existing .rps and let ACM and ESM build a new one, but it comes out the exact same. Is KB 000447456 not a good check for ACM and ESM? Do I need to rebuild AM and PM topologies and fix ACM and ESM? Or is there something totally different that I just missed?
No Events found!
SeanPopham
54 Posts
0
July 18th, 2017 13:00
Bryvo01,
The count of "^T " matches can be way higher when the remote repository accessors is used. This exception is not pointed out in the KB explicitly. The "^C " matches gives the number of instances in the repository. The "^T " also gives the number of instances when remote repository accessor is not used. But when the remote repository accessor is used for instances there will be two entries starting with "^T " (one to capture the accessory information and the other to capture the instance attribute information). The "^T " entry is followed by the actual instance name. I took the unique instance specific"^T " entries count, for both the repository provided, and it is (almost) matching the "^C " count. So, both repositories are proper.
Kind Regards,
Sean
SeanPopham
54 Posts
0
June 27th, 2017 15:00
Thank you for contacting Dell EMC Community Network.
Not sure if your issue has been address as of yet.. I'm currently researching more detail of your issue, but this is what I know so far. Please understand that we do have a way of checking and repairing some IP RPS's, but not all. My understanding is that both IP RPS's and ACM/ESM cannot be recreated from scratch. Please let me know if this is a production or test system.
Kind Regards,
Sean
DiamondCloud
7 Posts
0
June 27th, 2017 21:00
This is hilarious. Who is submitting these "Indian Style" questions?
bryvo01
8 Posts
0
June 28th, 2017 03:00
My issue has not been addressed yet, thank you!. This is a production environment.
SeanPopham
54 Posts
0
July 10th, 2017 14:00
Are you able to attache the RPS to the following location:
https://ftp.emc.com/action/login?domain=ftp.emc.com&username=nEJ4SRFAp&password=2ts4WBtc4c
Please let me know.
Kind Regards,
Sean
bryvo01
8 Posts
0
July 17th, 2017 06:00
Just uploaded, thanks Sean.
bryvo01
8 Posts
0
July 19th, 2017 04:00
Thank you for looking at them for me. I had no idea it was different with remote repository accessors.