Unsolved
This post is more than 5 years old
11 Posts
0
1712
November 26th, 2008 11:00
symclone BCV create fails after session activated against same STD Devices.
According to the SE manual for 6.5.2, in the section titled "Understanding copy session limits" in Creating a clone copy session section, up to 16 clone "sessions" are allowed. The manual later gives an example using concurrent BCV pairs, but does not go on to state what happens when TWO target groups are employed, for example, moving the STDs between the two to achieve the "independent" point in time copies desired. As a result, we are being forced to "teminate" any prior sessions against the other set of BCV prior to create for any given device group.
Does anyone have an experience to share, or should I open a support case as an "issue". We are currently using SE 6.5.1 on this SYMCLI host.
Does anyone have an experience to share, or should I open a support case as an "issue". We are currently using SE 6.5.1 on this SYMCLI host.
No Events found!
xe2sdc
2 Intern
•
2.8K Posts
0
November 26th, 2008 15:00
Message was edited by:
Stefano Del Corno
Frank02
11 Posts
0
December 3rd, 2008 10:00
It seems to mean that the same STD device can be in multiple device groups, but can there be independent clone copy sessions going on at the same time against a different set of BCV in each device group?
xe2sdc
2 Intern
•
2.8K Posts
0
December 3rd, 2008 12:00
I'll try to notify primus owner regarding incorrect path.
xe2sdc
2 Intern
•
2.8K Posts
0
December 4th, 2008 13:00
-concurrent operand on the symclone command, in order
to start a second "active" clone copy session with
success ?
Yep... That's why I said you have to use an unintuitive option
copy session in any way?
Nope.
operand on the device group queries to discover all
sessions against any devices in the device group.
Yup.. With -multi you'll ask to show ALL sessions, regardless of the DG you query. You'll find a flag that will show you if the pair is in the DG you queried.
Have fun with SymCli
Frank02
11 Posts
0
December 4th, 2008 13:00
Are you saying that I also have to use the -concurrent operand on the symclone command, in order to start a second "active" clone copy session with success ?
If this is done, will I be affecting the first clone copy session in any way?
Regardless, I understand that I will need the -multi operand on the device group queries to discover all sessions against any devices in the device group.