Start a Conversation

This post is more than 5 years old

Solved!

Go to Solution

121112

October 24th, 2013 12:00

Equallogic PS6100X: direct (dual) iscsi connections to 3 vmware ESX Hosts

Hello,

Because of cost savings, we are integrating

1x Dell Equallogic ps6100x (2 controllers with each 4 ports)

3x dell poweredge r720 (each have 2 ports dedicated for SAN storage trafic)

vSphere 5.5 (shared storage on the SAN)


Without the use of SAN switches. Each host has dual direct connection (1 to each SAN controller) with iscsi software initiator.

We have done this before with Dell MD3200i, which has also 2 controllers and 8 ports, so we are not expecting problems.

But now that I read more about the Equallogic, I am starting to get uncertain whether this setup will work?

I know this is not recommended but in this stage my only concern is that it will work (even with less performance).

Can you please give me some advise on this?

Best Regards,

Joris

P.S. If this is surely NOT possible, what would be the best/low cost way of making this possible?

17 Posts

October 24th, 2013 13:00

See this thread: http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1584108

Is auite a big decision now for me... I cannot test it first.

17 Posts

October 24th, 2013 13:00

I wonder if storage that is connected by ESX with iscsi and that is 'shared storage' for all hosts, is the same as direct attached storage.

Normally when speaking about DAS, it is not shared?

 

17 Posts

October 24th, 2013 13:00

Hello, thank you for the answer.

Are you 100% certain it will not work, while it certainly worked on the MD3200i?

Where can I find back (documentation?) that direct attach is not supported?

Is it because you cannot place the SAN ports in different subnets?

The Compatibility Matrix only shows >2K USD tested switches, that would cost me about 5K additional costs to put 2 of those in stack.

Not even Catalyst 2960 is mentioned, why use L3 switches just for that simple purpose...

While if I read the configuration guide, and if I would be OK with a cold-standby switch, I can use a 200 dollar unmanaged rack mounted Netgear switch (with low latency).

I assume I cannot use 2 unmaged switches, for a sort like reason that direct attached is not supported?

17 Posts

October 24th, 2013 14:00

Ok thanks a lot for your answer.

I can see this is definitely not 'supported'.

But as I read your answer... it probably will 'work' without switches, but will not have good performance at high loads?

So to be OK with Dell, we shoud use at least Cisco 3750X switches?

Lots of threads using 2960S stacked are found, but not in the Dell support list...

17 Posts

October 25th, 2013 06:00

Thank you very much for the information.

 

"The arrays design is such that any configured port is expected to be able to reach any server. (or other member in the group)"

But what happens if this is not.

Will it only cause "dropped connections" at high loads or will it just not work?

And are "dropped connections" just some lagging on the vmware hosts or will it cause a permanent or fail?

We will only be running a total of 30 virtual machines on those 3 hosts, in a production (non-IT) environment.

The only "burst" that I can think of is when some Backups are taken, or when deploying the VM's initially.

If that causes some reconnections or dropped TCP/IP packets, that is no problem as long as things keep running and the packets are resent.

We do not need this SAN to work on it's top performance limits.

 

It is just strange to introduce 6K on switches when enough NIC ports are available to do direct/redundant connections.

1 Rookie

 • 

62 Posts

October 25th, 2013 13:00

I would go so far, as if you've actually talked with Dell Sales, and they did not tell you would need to budget for switches. then someone has failed.

Equallogic arrays are really nice, but they are simply not designed for the senario you want to do.

Wanting to run a production enviroment on an Unsupported configuration. I cant even imagine why anyone would do that. The risk of dataloss is real, and the solution is purchasing a couple of switches that allow for iSCSI.  If you want to save money, find some refurbished Powerconnect 6248. I use them myself, and they are fine switches. 599$ on ebay

http://www.ebay.com/itm/DELL-POWERCONNECT-6248-48-PORT-GIGABIT-ETHERNET-SWITCH-6ZHK7F1-QTYs-INSTOCK-/171147626476?pt=US_Network_Switches&hash=item27d93187ec

17 Posts

November 27th, 2013 07:00

Hi,

We went for the 3750X series, stacked.

But now the customer wants to remove the "network" switches that were included in the orders and use the same 3750X stacked switch for this.

So the switch would be used for SAN and Network traffic, both.

We are planning to seperate the switch with VLANs internally.

Is this supported?

 

Or is this again an issue :(

17 Posts

December 9th, 2013 03:00

Hello,

 

We have a few more question about this.

Is the 3750E good enough or does it need to be the 3750X? Only difference I can find is features like power stack?

 

We are reported by customers that these switches cannot be configured jumbo frames for certain ports, but only for the entire switch.

So that would mean jumbo frames cannot be enabled.

The same people report that they had problems when jumbo frames were not enabled, and dell recommended them to enabled this and this solved to problem. But we cannot do this when the switch is shared for network traffic.

 

Can you give me any input on this please?

 

 

 

17 Posts

September 24th, 2015 12:00

It has been 2 years now, but I wanted to inform that we did use dedicated stacked Cisco 3750X switches (24p) combined with cisco specific switch settings from Equallogic documentation and combined with R720 equallogic plugins for ESX, all with best practices.

The system has been running under heavy load but runs very good.

22x raid10 10K 1Gb ISCSI

Dell Equallogic PS4100

Access Specification Name

IOps

MBps (Decimal)

Average Response Time

Max Throughput-100%Read

2562

84

17

RealLife-60%Rand-65%Read

4071

33

14

Max Throughput-50%Read

3392

111

14

Random-8k-70%Read

4128

34

13

No Events found!

Top