Start a Conversation

Unsolved

This post is more than 5 years old

1119

August 31st, 2007 08:00

20 million object limit?

Has anyone heard of an object count limit in a single DiskXtender extended drive? We have a DiskXtender drive that is using Centera for storage and have 19.8 million images on it. Recently a tech told us informally that DiskXtender had a 20 million object limit. He did not have any references I could not find anything in the documentation about this.

Can anyone confirm this?

Thanks,
Aran

129 Posts

September 3rd, 2007 06:00

As I heard this is not a DX limit, it is coming from Microsoft, they have a recommendation for the file coubnt on a NTFS volume. Unfortunately I do not have information which on witch operating system, wich version.

Krisztian

2.2K Posts

September 4th, 2007 09:00

Hmm.... I have not seen anything from Microsoft on that. The NTFS documentation on the Microsoft developers site states that the NTFS file system can hold over 4 billion objects and I could not find a practical file count limit in the documentation, just the 4 billion theoretical design limitation.

1 Message

September 4th, 2007 10:00

I currently have 5 extended drives on our DX install. One of my extended drives has 34,440,505 files and another one has 25,295,783. I am using DX for Windows ver 6.20.060 with the latest patch applied.

2.2K Posts

September 4th, 2007 11:00

Thanks for the information Ralph, I appreciate the response. We are running an older version, 5.60.049, and hopefully the object count won't be an issue as it has not been for you.

Aran

1 Message

May 21st, 2009 07:00

Hi Ralph!!

When you mentioned that your currently have 5 extended drives on our DX install. One of my extended drives has 34,440,505 files and another one has 25,295,783. I am using DX for Windows ver 6.20.060 with the latest patch applied.

Could you tell me you hardware specifications:

Like: How many processor have the server?

We want be sure that DX 6.x support more than 7 extended drives....


Best Regards,
Rodrigon

41 Posts

May 25th, 2009 17:00

Hi All,

In DX Install Guide, page 37, it states:
A drive that contains (or will contain) no more than 20 million to 25 million files.
As a drive approaches this limit, system functions such as background scans and
backups can take a significant amount of time.

Number of extended drives
The appropriate number of extended drives depends on the environment. In general,
however, it is better for each DiskXtender installation to manage fewer extended
drives. Fewer extended drives typically mean less impact on the system, and
therefore improved system performance.
If possible, a good rule of thumb is to use n-node processors, where n is equal to the
number of extended drives plus one. For example, a server with a four-node
processor should manage only three extended drives. This provides the equivalent of
a dedicated processor for each extended drive, leaving one processor free for any
other processing.
In environments where some of the extended drives are relatively inactive, a good
rule of thumb is seven or fewer extended drives, where only three or fewer are active.
Inactive extended drives can be used for retrieval of files, but access should be
relatively infrequent.

1 Message

October 6th, 2009 06:00

I have seen a system with over 130 million files on one extended drive. Definitely not recommended. The system performance is just fine, but background scans take weeks and backups also take too long.
No Events found!

Top